Cherry Hood

I have always been annoyed at the predominance of the objectification of the female form in art. Even today. Not because it is condescending to women but because it is not socially acceptable for the male form to be treated in the same way. People walk down the street with Kate Moss on their shirt or silhouette nudes. It is hard to fathom how the sexualized outline of a male on the mud flaps of a female’s ute would go down. Then if she wound down the window and called out “Give me a piece of that!” to a young man minding his own business on the side of the road? Who knows how people would react?

The female artist Cherry Hood paints image after image of males. These large portraits are mainly the torso and upper half of young boys. She is based in the southern highlands of New South Wales and works in quite a luxurious yet isolated studio. I was reading an article about Hood’s work today in GW magazine and was really irritated that she didn’t paint more of their bodies. It also got under my skin that these works are so controversial, that people often associate them with evil and negative feelings. For example, some people are reminded of their difficult childhoods, while others think of pedophilia.

Half way through the lengthy article I found what I had suspected all along. Hood was actually interested in the male form but there was a reason she didn’t paint it in its entirety. Society places so many restrictions on freedom in the creative arts. Even a friend of mine said to me that she thinks there should be some sort of line where artists just choose to show the pretty aspects of life because sometimes it can be too confrontational and disturbing or upsetting.

Hood had been struck by the fact that nudes in contemporary art referred only to the female nude. She was ridiculed in art class when she asked for a male model, although the teacher did acquiesce.

“In the early ‘90s, Hood held a student exhibition where she copied paintings of naked, pre-pubescent girls from books and added a penis, transforming them into boys. The police closed the exhibition and ordered her to cover the penises with brown paper…
It was so ridiculous. After all the fuss, I decided I didn’t want to make politics, I wanted to make art, so I’d just paint boys’ faces.”
(Hawley, Janet. Good Weekend March 21-23, 2008, p 44)

Is this a cop out? Does it still further the cause of creating a balance between males and females? Is it just a part of art that the audience is reactionary and the artist has the responsibility to deal with the reaction because she or he created the work?

To work or not to work

‘Teenage unemployment is still at an unacceptable high of 18.5 per cent and above 20 per
cent in four out of 10 regions across Australia. In one in three regions over the past year
teenage unemployment has actually increased.’

I pulled this out of Labor’s Social Inclusion policy document because it seems to be based on the idea that we should have 100% teenage employment. I wonder about this. Is it appropriate that all people aged 13-19 should be employed? If you are struggling through school, should you be employed or use your time to study and get extra help? If you have other sort of development opportunities, such as volunteering or travel, should you be working instead? If you are caring for your siblings or a parent, should you be working? Should you be allowing yourself to be exploited in the subtle ways most multinational franchises exploit young people, which most adults would never let them get away with?

And I want to even question whether this idea that teenagers should be working is really about some Protestant work-ethic morality, or about pure consumerism, rather than the welfare of young people.

If a young person lives in a family able to economically support her well-being could it be nice and welcome and affirmative that she does not have to go to work. She’ll be working most of her life, why not start as late as possible? Is going to work a moral good compared to not going to work when you are a teenager? Or would it be unfair if some wealthier kids were able not to work while others have to?

Or is it that young people who work therefore buy lots of things and enable retail outlets to pay their staff low wages and treat them like shit?

I did work during my last couple of years of high school for a movie theatre. I liked it because I was managed by a nice young man who let us, you know, talk, relax, and sit down when there was nothing to do and I got to see all movies for free and I didn’t work that many hours per week, with shifts that were only four or five hours. But I would have hated having to work in a supermarket or McDonalds and probably wasn’t old enough to work in an office. I can’t remember why I worked: if I wanted more spending money, if my parents wanted me to, if it was just the thing to do. But if I were to have a child (which I won’t) I think I would encourage her not to work, to give her as much time in life to experience her freedom.

I’d be interested to hear other people’s thoughts on this matter. To work or not to work, that is the teenage question!

gap years and work experience

So, you’ve taken a year off before uni… to travel or to work and save money so you’re not trying to subsist on measly Austudy payments and handouts from mum and dad.

Or you’re looking to gain some valuable work experience in your area of study - which isn’t a bad idea, as you’ll soon find out if your dream job is really for you. That way, it’s not too late to change your subjects before you start.

We get asked all the time for advice on how to land a job in magazines and what’s involved behind the scenes. I stumbled upon this great article, which provides some important tips on getting that work experience placement/internship, and how to make the most of the opportunity.

Key points include:

  • apply early - opportunities are snapped up quickly, or consider applying to lesser known publications as they receive fewer applications or have a much shorter waiting list
  • attention to detail - if you want a career in magazines, few things leave a worse first impression than mistakes in your application
  • don’t be a no-show - if for some reason you can’t make your placement, give as much notice as possible and save the mag’s staff a huge headache. The media industry is very nepotistic, and you never know when you might deal with these people again
  • find out about the dress code
  • see every task you’re given as an opportunity - even the boring ones
  • after the placement stay in contact - if you’ve proven your worth, you never know when a job opportunity might present itself.

A few things to keep in mind that weren’t mentioned in the article:

  • online opportunities can be just as valuable as in-office experience - you’ll learn valuable technological skills, hours are much more flexible, you don’t get stuck with the photocopying, and may actually get to do some writing tasks!
  • research is key - find out as much as you can about the publication you want to work for. Don’t just read the “about” page on their website - try and find a copy of the mag, as the online content is often very different to the printed version.

the rise of the weblebrity

- by Belle Gleeson

It’s a weird word, and an even weirder concept: the ‘weblebrity’.


Numa Numa Dance

Wikipedia describes the word ‘celebrity’ as ‘a widely-recognised or famous person who commands a high degree of public and media attention’, and the word web as…well, honestly, we all know what that word means. Weblebrities are the new generation of average people making it big in ‘Internet-Wood’.

But basically, anyone with a video camera in their hands and a dim-witted idea can become a weblebrity. These people achieve a high level of fame and recognition for streaming their own home videos on internet sites such as YouTube. They acquire celebrity status for essentially ‘blogging’ the things they do to amuse themselves.

Now, I’m not entirely against this new weblebrity concept. I will shamelessly admit to using research time for this article to watch some entertaining people here. Most people, however, either love the idea of weblebrities or absolutely loathe it. Entertainment comes in many forms; but so does stupidity. Where’s the line to separate the two? And when does it all go too far?

Take for instance, Chris Crocker. Most of you will know him. If not, picture this: guy films himself wearing makeup and crying about the treatment of Britney Spears by the media. When I first saw it I wasn’t sure if it was funny or creepy. Then I wondered what possessed him to film it, let alone broadcast it on the Internet. And it seems like I wasn’t the only one to think this. Chris Crocker has now been interviewed on a number of shows in the US, and the video of him having a break down for Britney has taken over 350,000 hits on YouTube.

It seems crazy that one video, albeit one of the funnier ones I have seen, has caused so much public attention. Is this the type of entertainment we are craving now? What happened to going to the circus to watch people making fools out of themselves, or to the theatre to see comedy for a laugh? It is obvious that sitting at home and being able to watch anything you want on the Internet is a lot easier, but does that justify the fact that anyone can showcase themselves via this means? It seems to be that our generation, as a majority, find more entertainment on the net by looking for people to laugh at, rather than laugh with. It seems we are encouraging this type of behaviour by supporting it.

The ‘Numa Numa’ guy was just a bored, regular guy, sitting in his room listening to foreign pop songs one day when he decided to have a little dance to it. The result being over 14 million views on Newgrounds.com, the original site he broadcast it on. I saw an interview on TV with him not too long ago—he’s raking in the money from what was an act of boredom. Evidently, we love him. And now he’s gone on to help companies advertise their good and services, he has thousands of people imitating his dance in nightclubs and has a whole fan base of people who imitate his video and broadcast it themselves. He would never have become a celebrity for what he did; but in the wacky world of weblebrities, thanks to the people who log onto those sites every day, he’s a star.

If that’s all it takes to become a famous weblebrity, nervous break downs over female pop stars and dancing like nobody is watching, then give me a camera! Keep an eye out for what I might openly publicise.

the impact of the media on youth

- by Kelsey Horvath

printmedia.jpg

It is widely known that the media influences young people every day – in things they see, hear, and experience. I decided to interview someone related to this theme to discover how they felt and what they knew about the media’s manipulation of youth. I conducted an interview with Rachel Funari, lip magazine’s founding editor, via email. I wrote this essay on my findings, including some of my own opinions and views as well as Rachel’s.

I chose to interview Rachel because lip magazine is so opposed to the media’s manipulation of young women, making it a stark contrast from many popular young women’s magazines. I structured a lot of my questions to emphasise this contrast.

I also chose to interview Rachel because it would be much easier to gain a clear, unbiased view of how the media works. Someone working at a corporation that largely employed the use of media manipulation would not give completely truthful answers.

I successfully gained information concerning both these topics. However, the main body of this essay is not factual; it is a combination of mine and Rachel’s opinions, with additional facts to support our statements.

One of the first issues I focused on when structuring my questions was the subject of contrast. When I asked what the main differences were “between lip magazine and a mainstream magazine for young women such as Dolly or Girlfriend”, Rachel supplied me with a detailed list. One of the main differences she noted was that issues of lip magazine rarely contain information about celebrities, instead focusing on less well-known women who were successful in fields such as business and politics. I saw that by doing this, lip magazine tries to introduce its readers to a variety of rewarding career paths.

This illustrates the fact that most magazines for young women attempt to “manipulate people, women especially, into feeling insecure and to believe that spending money on something is the answer to fixing it”, as Rachel replied to another one of my questions. This information showed me that these magazines make their readers feel insecure by showing them glimpses of a lifestyle of someone that is generally thought to be perfect.

The magazine then shows its readers advertisements of beauty products that, according to the advertisements, will make them look like the celebrities that the reader has just been mentally comparing themselves to. By interspersing articles about celebrities with advertisements for beauty products, popular magazines for young women manipulate readers into buying things they do not realistically need. This is where Rachel pointed out that lip again differs from mainstream magazines for young women, because “lip is 99 per cent content, with hardly any ads”.

Rachel also told me that lip magazine acknowledges eating disorders and other health problems suffered by young women, providing a variety of recounts of personal experiences, whereas mainstream teenage girls’ magazines only ever contain gossipy articles about celebrities who have had eating disorders. This showed me that these magazines are not showing that celebrities are human too; they are putting the celebrities down, making an example of them.

Another difference that Rachel pointed out between lip and mainstream magazines is that in lip magazine, submissions of stories, art and poetry are encouraged. There is very rarely a submissions page in a popular girls’ magazine. I realised that this symbolises that lip magazine encourages its readers to pay attention to what is going on around them and to take part. Popular girls’ magazines don’t want their readers to take notice of the world around them. The magazine finds it easier to deceive people who are interested in nothing but their own problems.

Rachel also showed that lip’s fashion articles focus on individual style rather than the popular trends advertised in magazines with a lot of celebrity content. I saw that this means of advertising the clothes is another way of getting the readers to try and reach the standard set by the celebrities in the magazine.

One of the other differences in Rachel’s list was that lip contains much more realistic sexual content and is a lot more truthful about what a sexual relationship entails.

In short, lip magazine tries to make its readers aware of the manipulation of the media that they are being subjected to, whereas popular young women’s magazines try to make their readers feel insecure about their appearance, personality, and life, in order to buy products that will supposedly “fix” these problems.

While interviewing Rachel, I was able to gain her viewpoint about issues of media manipulation in teenage magazines. My second question asked her opinion of the media’s manipulation of young people. Rachel replied that “the media manipulates people, women especially, into feeling insecure and to believe that spending money on something is the answer to fixing it”. This is true especially of popular teenage girls’ magazines, where girls are encouraged to buy beauty products to try and fit themselves into the idea of “the perfect woman” projected by the magazines they read. This “perfect” ideal is symbolised in the form of thin, stylish, famous and beautiful actresses, singers and models.

In one of my questions, where I asked Rachel what she believed was the biggest issue in mainstream magazines that robs women of their individuality, she replied “that there is only one idea of woman portrayed. The contemporary woman (and young women) is someone who cries to her best friend and eats chocolate when her boyfriend dumps her; comes into work with hangovers from drinking too much; uses shopping as therapy; is on a diet; spends an inordinate amount of money on the right clothes and hair and makeup … and is sexually experienced.”

This is a collection of characteristics symbolised in some of the celebrities shown in articles of teenage girls’ magazines. These magazines completely omit the idea that “ordinary” women who work to make an impression on the world can be just as content with their lives as celebrities are. “One doesn’t have to be famous to be special or well loved” was Rachel’s reply to the question “Celebrities are provided as role models in popular young women’s magazines. How do you feel that these typical role models should be changed?” The part of her answer to this question that I quoted here sums up the situation perfectly: “ordinary” people are just as loved by their friends and family as celebrities are, perhaps even more so.

By portraying only one type of stereotypical woman, mainstream magazines are “robbing their readers of their individuality”.

In summary, lip differs greatly from most magazines for young women. For example, lip magazine tries to help its readers understand their lives, sort out their problems, and also become aware and interested in the issues in the world around them. Mainstream magazines do not do this; they encourage their readers to become self-absorbed and conform to trends set by celebrities.

When I was doing this assignment, I gained a valuable insight into the media’s manipulation of youth through magazines for teenage girls. I saw how these magazines encourage girls and women to fit into a profile of characteristics symbolised by the celebrities present within their pages. These characteristics are not particularly useful to the girls and women later on in life, and the need to fit into a profile limits their feelings of capability and makes them feel insecure.

In short, teenage magazines not only present distorted information to their readers, they also distort the readers’ manners of thinking by doing so.

“gardasil?”

- by Belle Gleeson

bottles.jpg

I am the girl in the bubble.

Not literally of course, but I am the type of girl who manages to hurt herself daily from even the most mundane of tasks and is on a first name basis with almost every doctor in Canberra. So last week, I hobbled into my GP’s office after moaning for a week about back pain. Being in a doctor’s office is really not my cup of tea, like many of you I’m sure. But when she unveiled one of those dreaded little needles from the safety of her drawer, I started to wonder whether my back pain was really that bad.

Now, I don’t have a huge fear of needles, (trust me, if I can get a chest tattoo and come out alive, I can definitely stand a little jab from a doctor) but I was curious as to why I was going to need one. She just smiled at me and said, “It’s your Gardasil injection”.

As a female, I should know what that means.

Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women worldwide, right behind breast cancer. In Australia around 740 women are diagnosed with cervical cancer and around 270 women die annually from it. Luckily, and I use that term lightly, cervical cancer is one of the few cancers where scientists know exactly what causes it.

Cervical cancer is caused by a sexually transmitted infection called Human Papilloma Virus, or HPV. Studies have shown that up to 80% of women will become infected with this virus, but before you panic, over 100 forms of the virus exist, and only a handful have the ability to cause cancer. And in the majority of cases, the infection simply disappears without a trace before it has the chance to develop into something more serious. Of course, the best way to detect whether or not you have HPV is through a Pap smear. And while it isn’t the most pleasant of things to do, it could save your life. Besides, you only need to go once every two years, which is just enough time to wipe the embarrassment from your mind before your next visit!

Every year, our government spends more than $90 million dollars on the National Cervical Screening Program, making Australia one of the best countries when it comes to promoting cervical cancer prevention. This has dramatically reduced the number of cervical cancer related deaths, as early detection is the best. Since 1985, the number of deaths has more than halved.

Gardasil is a new vaccination that can help prevent cervical cancer. It prevents infection from HPV type 16 and 18, the most common strains of the virus causing cervical cancer. Gardasil has shown to be 100% effective in women who have never been sexually active, and therefore do not have the virus at the time of immunisation.

The vaccine is administered as three injections over a seven month period, for women aged 12-26. If you are aged 12-13, the vaccine is delivered to you in your first year of high school. It’s a school based program, which is effective because it will get you vaccinated before there is a chance you will be exposed to the HPV infection. If you’re older, but still in school, you can also get it through the same program. And, if you’re not in school, you can pop into your GP and have it done.

I conducted a survey on girls from 15-24 years, the target group for this injection, to find out how many girls were having the injection. The results were interesting, showing that most young women who’d received it, had done so through school vaccination programs.

Is it laziness, a lack of ‘adequate’ advertising, or factors relating to accessibility that are keeping working girls out of the GP’s office? I asked those who hadn’t yet had it, why, and the replies I got were all basically the same: no time; did not know about it; couldn’t be bothered. Perhaps it’s worth considering a program of vaccinations at work? Or has our government done enough by providing us with this vaccine?

Alarmingly almost 99% of the girls I surveyed said cervical cancer didn’t worry them. Cervical cancer can take ten years to properly develop, so detecting it in its early stages, or maybe even preventing it, is vital. And it starts now. What we need to understand is that there is really no excuse not to get it done; there is no price for good health, and this vaccination is already free.

plotting your path for the new year

path.jpg

The celebration of the new year and the tradition of making New Year’s resolutions can be traced back to the early Babylonians, around 4000 years ago. In those days the most common resolution is alleged to have been the returning of borrowed farming equipment. These days common resolutions include to lose weight, to quit smoking, to do more exercise, or to save more money. Needless to say, many of us have big plans but never follow them through. Three days later we’re gorging on chocolate, thinking about how much easier it is to stay on the lounge instead of running around the block, thinking ‘I’ll start tomorrow’. Only tomorrow never comes. Before you know it, New Year’s Eve is around again and you’re making the same old promise to yourself.

So what has all this to do with you?

Having goals/resolutions can help to keep you focused on where you want to go with your life. Goal setting is an important step in actually achieving them. Often we make resolutions at this time of year purely out of tradition and conversation and never follow them through. This year use the ‘New Year’s Resolution’ to set yourself a path for 2007. Maybe it’s obtaining your driver’s licence, doing well at school/uni, or maybe it’s spending more time engaging in your creative pursuits.

So don’t just think about it—do it!

Create a plan

Think about some things you really want to achieve. The more you want to do something, the more likely you are to follow it through. The important thing is that your goals for the year are realistic, do-able.

Write it down

Write down your goals as you think of them. Divide them into short, medium and long term. Hang them in your room or your office, somewhere you can see them and be reminded regularly of what you have set out to do this year. Cross them off the list or highlight them as you achieve them.

Think long term

Short term goals will help you stay on track to achieving the longer term ones. Setting one long term goal will see you lose motivation early on because the reward is so far off that sometimes it seems like it will never arrive. Setting shorter term goals and achieving them will see you experience success and keep you motivated to achieve the longer term goals.

Set yourself some guidelines

Give yourself two things important things: specificity with enough room for flexibility. Sounds a little contradictory, I know! When I talk about being specific I mean when you set your goals let them be clear. Don’t just say, ‘I want to spend more time on my creative pursuits this year’ or ‘I want to save money this year’, as this is too ambiguous. Set some guidelines: for example, ‘I want to spend half an hour three days a week working on my novel’ or ‘I want to save twenty dollars a week’. When doing this, though, be careful to allow yourself some flexibility as sometimes things come up. Not allowing yourself flexibility will see you feeling like you’ve failed or cause you to resent what you’re trying to do. For example, if you miss putting away that twenty dollars one week, make it up over the next four weeks by saving an extra five dollars each week.

Stay motivated and reward yourself

Sometimes the path to achieving one’s goals seems like such hard work. Losing motivation often leads to not following through with our goals. Reward yourself once you’ve reached certain stages; this will help you to stay motivated. Find things that motivate you and use these when you’re feeling uninspired. Perhaps it’s reading your favourite author to remind you that this is what you want to do, or perhaps it’s walking past the travel agent, knowing that at the end of the year you too can walk in there and book your holiday!

Good luck.

climate change: the challenge

from issue 14: by Ophelia Tynan

glix.jpg

Even if we try, it’s hard to now avoid the issue of climate change. Everywhere we go, there is mention of this strange and bizarre phenomenon – the television, the bookstore, the newspaper, the cinema, the mall, the department stores, the supermarket… why the fuss? Why is this scientific sensation such a strong influence in our society? Why has it been one of the strongest issues in politics all over the world, and why have entire countries pledged to fight this cause?

what is climate change?
In a nutshell, climate change is when the average temperature of the earth – currently 15°C – warms or cools. Another word for climate change is global warming, although this phrase is slowly being phased out because people didn’t take the threat seriously enough when the phrase suggested warming as something good and enjoyable.

limate change has occurred in the past, though not for many thousands of years. Ice ages are an example of sudden climate changes that occurred for a number of natural reasons still being discovered by scientists today.

causes of climate change
There are many reasons why climate change occurs, both natural and caused by human activity. Some factors include:

  • Greenhouse gas emissions: although greenhouse gas emissions are a relatively new cause of climate change historically speaking, today they are the largest cause of climate change action. Greenhouse gases come from places such as coal-fired energy plants, petrol-fuelled vehicles, and so on.
  • Deforestation: removing forests for development or agricultural production removes a crucial part of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Solar variation: the sun emits different levels of heat during its life, and there is ample evidence to suggest that past climate changes have been related to this.

the three tipping points for climate change
Many climate scientists, including Australian of the Year, Tim Flannery, believe that there are three tipping points. Flannery argues that there are points in climate change activity that, if they were to occur, would trigger runaway climate change, impossible to stop. These are:

  • The collapse of the Gulf Stream: the Gulf Stream is the centre of what is called the ocean conveyor belt – it sends the strongest ocean currents around the world. It only works with the precise amount of fresh water and salt water, but climate change is changing this delicate ecosystem incredibly quickly. If large amounts of fresh water from Greenland or the Arctic melted into this system, or if the Atlantic Ocean pumped too much salty water into it due to increased water evaporation, the ocean conveyor would simply shut down. And when this happens, it would destroy Europe’s climate and send it into an ice age.
  • Collapse of the Amazonian rainforests: the water evaporation in the air, reducing rain and humidity, causes the Amazonian rainforests to fade and die. Not only would this kill hundreds of species and destroy the tourism industry for the Amazonian rainforest, it would destroy the largest forest – hence, the largest source of greenhouse gas reduction – and make our emissions skyrocket.
  • Methane gas release from the sea floor: a certain kind of natural greenhouse gas – methane – is trapped underneath the sea floor by ice crystals. The methane is kept safe and locked into the ice crystals by the freezing temperatures. However, if the deep sea temperatures were to increase, the massive amounts of methane would be released. The last time this occurred, it caused the largest extinction event that ever occurred.

impacts of climate change
Variations in the atmosphere and temperature may not seem important in the grand scheme of things; it is a matter of converting the complex science into reality. If climate change was to take hold by 2100, even a one or two degree increase in our average temperature, we would have catastrophic events such as:

  • Rising sea levels: millions of people around the world currently live within one metre of the current sea level. If this were to change even by 0.5 of a metre, this would displace millions of people, leaving them without homes and destroying countries’ economies. If Greenland, Antarctica or the Arctic melted, we could see sea level rises of over six metres, wiping out entire cities. If current predictions are underestimated, as many scientists are now arguing, world maps would have to be redrawn. We are facing a crucial moment in history – seeing and creating the next Atlantis.
  • Extinction of many species such as the polar bear: even though the extinction of thousands of species is heartbreaking enough, it would include many species such as birds, insects and marine life that would destroy ecosystems, causing massive problems for humanity.
  • Extreme weather: as Australians, we already know the effects of wild weather. We have bushfires, cyclones, droughts and floods. However, climate change would not only continue this, it would intensify it. This would cause major economic, humanitarian and environmental crises that would cost the country and the world more than a mere dollar amount.

These are a small selection of major environmental impacts that would occur if we allowed climate change to gain any more speed than it already has running.

action on climate change
Climate change has the potential to change the world in hundreds of different ways. However, action to stop it has been slow at best. Political leaders are the hardest minds to change, and have been halting progress on climate change prevention for many reasons, such as:

  • Interests in the business community: many industries and businesses feel they would lose wealth and jobs to help prevent climate change, such as General Motors and the death of the electric car. Many politicians such as President George Bush and Prime Minister John Howard have strong ties to the business communities, hence their slow uptakes to climate change action.
  • The Greenhouse Mafia: Clive Hamilton, author of Scorcher: The Dirty Politics of Climate Change, wrote about the self-named ‘Greenhouse Mafia’, made up of some of the strongest and most influential industry representatives. Hamilton reports that not only did they pressure the government in favour of climate change inaction, but they had an active role in creating policy and attitudes towards climate change within Parliament.
  • Economy: most anti-climate change action leaders believe that the economy must be sacrificed in order for us to take action on climate change. However, there is ample evidence from many economists and activists that suggests that this is completely incorrect. Taking action would open us to new business opportunities, create jobs and wealth, as well as preserving future generations’ futures.

get involved!
To do something about climate change, take one of these steps:

  • Petition local and federal politicians.
  • Use ethanol-based petrol whenever possible in your car. Even better: walk, cycle, skip, jump, run, or hopscotch to work or school.
  • Switch to green energy supplied by wind, solar and hydro power.
  • Join a pressure group like Greenpeace to help campaign.
  • Use less power in the house – turn off lights, switch off power points when you’re not using electrical equipment, and turn the thermostat down just one degree in the winter to save mountains of energy.

where to find more information
Websites:

Books:

  • The Weather Makers by Tim Flannery
  • Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit by Al Gore
  • Scorcher: The Dirty Politics of Climate Change by Clive Hamilton

Films:

  • An Inconvenient Truth
  • Who Killed the Electric Car?

a man and a financial plan

from issue 14: by Rachel Longhurst

financialplan.jpg

I often wonder whether I should have paid more attention in maths class. Don’t get me wrong, I can do basic maths and maybe I could have been capable of more had I applied myself. I get that two plus two is four, that three by three is nine, but in truth, I never really had an interest in it. The only time I found math semi-interesting was when we did algebra, and I have a sneaking suspicion that was because letters were involved. Give me letters and language any day over numbers and sums.

I recently read Joan Baker’s A Man is Not a Financial Plan (Allen and Unwin, 2007), a book for women on investing for wealth and independence. The most important message in this book is that women need to be prepared to create their own wealth. Despite the enormous leaps feminism has made, there are still many women who rely on finding a man to bring financial security to their lives. There is no guarantee that love and money are going to come hand in hand. No guarantee that, if it does, this wealth will protect against injury, divorce and death. With the increasing cost of living today, expecting a man to provide financial security is foolish. The reality is that many families rely on two incomes just to get by comfortably.

I’ve never been blasé about money as such. I grew up in a one-income household and, while my father worked damn hard to make sure we never went without, I made a conscious decision that my life would never be that hard. I’m not convinced that money makes people exorbitantly happy, but it does make life easier up to a certain point.

I took myself out of my regional town of birth, waved goodbye to my boyfriend and lived below the poverty line on government support and the minimal extra I was allowed to make (that studies are only now just highlighting isn’t nearly enough). I studied. I acquired a job to ensure that I could support myself, and I’ve taken away from my experiences an appreciation of how money can be spent and managed. I actively started investing for my future.

However, my disinterest in maths did overflow into what some might call a disrespect (I prefer the term ‘slight oversight’) for what numbers can generate. Wealth. Of course I knew wealthy people existed, but it never occurred to me that I might be able to choose to become wealthy. Independent and self-sufficient, yes. But never wealthy.

Joan writes that it’s all about having a simple plan: deciding that you want to be wealthy; learning what you need to about how to create this wealth; and taking action. Seems ridiculously easy, doesn’t it? It isn’t. But Joan’s book investigates and explains the intricacies of markets, investment, reinvestment, and using your income to create wealth in terms that non-financially literate people can understand. It highlights the importance of creating a surplus, budgeting and maximising your income. It advocates for avoiding the vicious cycle of debt by making friends with the virtuous cycle of wealth.

While I’m still not convinced I will be, or even sure that I want to be, wealthy any time soon, I have, as a result of what I read, reassessed what I do with my income, paid off depreciating debts, invested in the property market (apparently I have to be prepared to go into debt initially to make money) and banned myself from acquiring a credit card.

Essentially this book is about offering women choice. They can choose to become wealthy, or just to be comfortable, or somewhere in between. Either way, this book empowers women to feel that they can do it and offers the initial tools and motivation to start.

I’ve begun to appreciate not only what I can do with money, but what my money can do for me. I’ve started to ask sales people (where it’s expected) whether that’s the best price they can do; I’m paying attention to interest rates and what the share market is doing (sometimes); I’m learning what products can be purchased cheaper without skimping on quality; I’ve set myself spending limits and saving goals. I’ve also gained an amazing appreciation for what my parents did on the income they had.

So I have a man and I’m establishing a financial plan. I’ve placed myself on the financial learning curve at least. To be perfectly honest, the word finance still makes me shudder (finance equals money and money equals numbers and numbers remind me of maths)… but to get the most out of life, you must be prepared to get out of your comfort zone. I firmly believe that.

hip hop: shake that arse for me

from issue 13: by Chloe Angyal

slaptherapper.jpg

Picture it: two men are out on a Saturday night. Leaning against the bar, one of them turns to the woman next to him and says, ‘I hope you don’t get mad at me, but I told my friend you were a freak. He says he wants a slut, I hope you don’t mind; I told him how you like it from behind’.

Some women, myself included, would slap the man in question. Someone with a little more self-control might ignore him and walk away. Once done with the slapping, however, I would pause to think about what exactly he had said to me and, more importantly, how on earth he came to think that it was an acceptable thing to say.

The charming come-on in the above paragraph is actually paraphrased from lyrics uttered by rapper Nate Dogg in his recent collaboration with Eminem on the track ‘Shake That’, which is a narrative of the two men’s adventures on their night out at a strip club. Immediately after Nate Dogg’s line comes Eminem’s echo, also directed at the woman (again, put yourself in her shoes), ‘I hope you don’t get mad at me, but I heard that you were a freak. Tonight I want a slut, I hope you don’t mind, I heard that you like it from behind’. For the record—if someone approached me like that, he’d be crawling out of that club on his hands and knees.

The hip hop movement, mostly in the form of music, has gained momentum in Australia in the last five years. Every year another few artists appear in the charts and for every single released, a video clip is made and played on network and cable television. The general point of these video clips is to construct an image for the hip hop artist—in the case of the male artist, he’s rich, famous and attractive (or in the case of less than physically perfect specimens, he’s attractive because he’s rich and famous), and he spends his life singing, driving his ‘pimped up ride’ and fighting off women with a stick (a stick that we can only presume is covered in bling).

The most commonly used video clip formula is the wall-to-wall women formula, where the man is in a club that appears to have no male patrons except for him. A good example is Nelly’s ‘Hot in Herre’ video clip: flattering lighting, industrial quantities of body oil and dozens of sweaty women who, not wearing much to begin with, obediently respond to the instructions in the lyrics, ‘It’s getting hot in here, so take off all your clothes’. Eventually it gets so hot that the emergency sprinklers come on, making whatever clothing remains cling to the young, lithe bodies of the suggestively dancing women.

OutKast’s ‘I Like the Way You Move’ video portrays women as safari animals—lions, giraffes and antelope—grazing the plains in bathing suits and high heels, while hunters, played by the band’s two male singers, watch them through binoculars. This kind of symbolistic objectification of women has a lot to answer for.

In a recent forum, lip asked young women how images in hip hop make them feel about themselves, including whether it affects their ideas of what’s considered sexy. Several responded that the images don’t affect their own ideas, but felt that they do mould men’s ideas of sexiness, which in turn affects how they are viewed by those men. Therefore, the images that appear so often in videos can indirectly affect women who don’t even watch them. Thinking about this, it doesn’t seem fair that young women who choose not to consume the hip hop culture can’t avoid the expectations it sets up.

Natieka, an eighteen-year-old girl from Washington DC, wrote, ‘videos and lyrics don’t really affect what I think is sexy, but they do blur the lines for girls as to what is truly expected by men sexually’. And she makes an excellent point. If young women take what they see in video clips as a truthful indicator of what men expect from them, then our generation is in serious trouble indeed. These women are no role models: scantily clad, oiled, made up and draping themselves over male rappers who refer to them only as ‘bitches’ or ‘hos’.

As the charming and subtle Eminem and Nate Dogg demonstrated earlier, hip hop lyrics paint ugly pictures of male – female relations. Usually, the acts of sex described in these songs are entirely one-sided affairs, with the man’s pleasure being the top, and sometimes only, priority. The woman’s sexuality or sexual needs are barely considered, except for the disclosure that ‘she likes it from behind’, which earns her the label of ‘slut’. It should be noted, as per usual, when judging sexual habits of men and women, that his plan to bed every woman in the club does not make Eminem a ‘slut’, no matter how many times he does it from behind. Even more concerning is the implication that enjoying sex seems enough to make a woman a slut. I know plenty of women who enjoy sex, who crave it and think about it as much as their male peers, but that’s not slutty—it’s human and normal and totally acceptable when guys do it. A hip hop synonym for ‘slut’ is ‘freak’, and it’s very rare to find a man being referred to as a freak.

The lyrics to Petey Pablo’s ‘Freak-a-Leek’ are revolting, but telling. The rapper describes his ideal woman as—and I’m paraphrasing, because a direct quotation is unprintable—someone who ‘wants to try new sexual positions, isn’t scared of a big penis and loves to receive oral sex from another woman, because I’m not drunk enough to do it myself’. No, I’m not joking. This man wants an adventurous (and presumably flexible) woman who isn’t afraid of a (presumably his) large penis, and who doesn’t mind if he, Mr Pablo, has absolutely no interest in her sexual pleasure. Damn, don’t you just want to jump in line to be that girl?

The young women who responded to the online forum gave intelligent, insightful answers, which should give us hope—clearly not every girl out there wants to grind on a bling-clad rapper and head back to his hotel room for a groupie-esque night of catering to his (and only his) every sexual desire. I’m incredibly proud of the many lip readers who recognise that, as women, we can choose how men see us; we don’t have to accept the images hip hop holds up as the ideal.

I’m not proud of the women artists in hip hop who succumb to the pressure of the industry and become loud, influential enforcers of that ideal. Destiny’s Child’s last release as a group was ‘Cater 2 U’, and for the three girls who once topped the charts with ‘Independent Women’, what a turn around it was. ‘When you come home late tap me on the shoulder I’ll roll over/…I’m here to serve you’. Um, what? Apparently the men of hip hop aren’t the only ones guilty of portraying women as sexual toys or servants. It’s even more offensive when women have internalised the image enough to want to sell it to other women; a sick form of self-sabotage.

I’ll be the first to admit that a great beat is irresistible. And I’m not suggesting that we must boycott a beat because we don’t like the lyrics laid down over the top. What I am suggesting is that young women learn to watch and listen critically. Do we really want to be giving our money to a section of the music industry that promotes such appalling treatment of women? And do we really want to emulate the images we see in hip hop, sending the message to young men that it’s okay for them to treat us the way rappers treat their hos? We are not hos, we are not freaks, we are women. And we are fabulous.

  • lip newsletter

    Enter your details to subscribe to lip's free monthly e-newsletter. Each month we'll send you our latest news, opportunities, and exclusive features.

  • Ad Space



  • lip Online





  • AddThis Feed Button
  • AddThis Social Bookmark Button