2 responses to “cheap neon dreams”

  1. Erin Stewart

    I went to Zara a few weeks after the store opened in Melbourne and I wasn’t so impressed either. I’m not a big lover of the fluorescent though.

    You bring up an important point about sustainability. I would think that most of us have enough clothes to last us through the decade were it not for trend changes. I would guess that the 2-3 week Zara cycle is deliberately to make people feel that they look out-of-date more often than they usually would otherwise.

  2. Erin

    I think Zara may be more interesting on the environmental front than suggested here. Better? I don’t know, but certainly more complex. I follow a apparel industry blog that is very concerned about sustainability, and Zara is a hot topic there. See: http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/zaras_300_designers/
    and: http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/zara_and_lean_retail/

    I don’t know if you have TJ Maxx, or other such “discount name brand” stores in Australia, but they are an excellent example of what happens to clothes in the current system. A “push” manufacturer makes as many of a certain product as they think will sell, then the orders come in and, whoops, they made too many, and are then sold off to discount stores if possible, and eventually hit the landfill if not sold. That is the model of most apparel manufacturing today. Zara follows more of a “pull” model, orders first, then manufacture only what is ordered. Not necessarily “sustainable”, but better than the lemmings pushing the lemmings like most brands selling apparel. Interesting stuff, I’d like to get a look-see at a Zara’s store myself.

Leave a Reply