think about it
Your cart is empty
Visit The Shop

Breastfeeding= pornography, apparently

I suppose it’s the Bill Henson effect, but it seems like lately everyone has been particularly on edge about the lines between art and porn, especially when it comes to photography. I’ve written about a few different instances of this in the past few months, and the issues are always pretty similar. This time, the dictator of what’s appropriate is Facebook- and the offensive act is breastfeeding.

Melbourne photographer Christopher Rimmer posted on his Facebook page pictures that he had taken of tribal Himba women on a recent trip to Africa, which are part of an upcoming exhibition about the western influence on Africa and the effect on its natural environment and tribal culture. Each of the women he photographed gave their consent to have their pictures shown. But because the women are bare-chested, and one is breast-feeding her child, Facebook banned them for being ‘pornographic’ and ‘unsuitable for children.’

Facebook does not allow ‘content that is hateful, threatening or pornographic; incites violence; or contains nudity or graphic or gratuitous violence.’ Okay. But the idea that breastfeeding is somehow ‘pornographic’ and ‘unsuitable for children’ is just kind of bizarre. First of all, I have trouble imagining that hoards of young children are browsing a professional photographer’s Facebook page. But even if they were, and they did stumble across these pictures, sure, they’d probably giggle, but I don’t think they’d be shocked in any way. Most children know about breastfeeding. Their understanding of what breasts are for is to give milk to babies. They have most likely seen it happen before.

And they should (in my opinion) be exposed to it. Understanding that breastfeeding is a natural part of life, instead of seeing it as something shameful that should be hidden away, is the only way we’ll ever move on from this current climate where breastfeeding in public so often becomes a political issue.

This all seems to stem from some kind of misguided logic that assumes breastfeeding must somehow be in some way sexual. Which is insane. Yes, breasts are generally associated with sex. But breastfeeding puts them in an entirely different context. It might provoke a sense of discomfort in a lot of people because of the difficulty in separating the two contexts, but that doesn’t mean the act in itself is in any way pornographic.

I have a friend (or Facebook friend at least, which isn’t quite the same thing) who constantly uploads pictures of herself posing in scanty wisps of lingerie. To me, that’s far more inappropriate (and potentially offensive and dangerous etc) than Rimmer’s photographs, but using the simple criterion that there is no nipple showing, nobody would dare try to intervene and tell her she couldn’t do that.

This case is particularly problematic because the photographs in question are demonstrating another culture. Tribal Himba have always worn loincloths and painted their bodies with ochre; it is entirely normal for women to be bare-chested in their culture. It is only, paradoxically, the act of banning the pictures that in fact sexualises them.

Still, Rimmer has the right attitude about it- he says he’s going to send Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg a signed print of one of the pictures that was deemed inappropriate…

5 thoughts on “Breastfeeding= pornography, apparently

  1. It’s ironic that the one biological function breasts perform – producing nutrient rich milk in the mammary glands – is the one thing people (and facebook) tend to find find pornographic and offensive. It’s idiotic.

  2. As a mother of 2 who was only able to breastfeed for a short amount of time I think this is disgusting!!! Yes breasts are associated with sex but we all know (my 3 1/2 year old included) that breasts are for feeding!!! It is such a shame that the sick ams perverted have made this issue an issue in the first place!! Shame on you facebook for not seeing the difference!! I have seen countless links to porn sites posted by girls who have facebook accounts and this act is not stopped!!! Wake up and smell the century people!!!

  3. I feel facebook have set themselves up for an open debate here. If in making this decision they deemed it inappropriate due to a form of nudity, We may just have had to of bitten our tongues and accepted the fact that yes these woman are naked. Even if in the most natural way possible. However this is not the case. Labelling this photography as pornographic has really thrown this out there for argument considering the acceptable default pictures out there. I can also say i reported a picture on FB several months ago showing a very revealing sixteen year old breast and nipple with a nineteen year old boy pretending to lick it. This picture is still up today and never been removed.so right now FB is sounding a tad hypocrytical.

  4. Pingback: A Woman’s Right to Breastfeed | Lip Magazine

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>